Recruiting senior executives for social housing organisations requires a fundamentally different approach than traditional corporate hiring. After guiding many senior managers through this process with housing associations and local authorities throughout the UK, we've learned that conventional interview techniques often miss the mark entirely.
The social housing sector demands leaders who can navigate complex stakeholder relationships, balance commercial pressures with social purpose, and operate within an intricate regulatory framework. Standard competency-based interviews rarely reveal whether a candidate possesses these nuanced capabilities.
The Problem with Traditional Interview Approaches
Most housing organisation boards fall into predictable traps when interviewing senior candidates. They focus heavily on technical experience—"Have you managed a development programme of this scale?"—or rely on generic leadership questions borrowed from corporate playbooks. This approach consistently fails to identify candidates who will truly thrive in the unique environment of social housing.
We've witnessed outstanding private sector executives struggle immensely when they underestimate the complexity of tenant engagement, while others with modest CVs excel because they instinctively understand the delicate balance between commercial viability and social mission.
Scenario-Based Assessment: The Foundation of Effective Interviews
The most revealing interview technique we employ involves presenting candidates with realistic scenarios they would face in the role. Rather than asking "How do you handle difficult stakeholders?", we present a specific situation: "You're three months into the role as CEO. The local MP has called an emergency meeting because residents are threatening to occupy your offices over delayed major works. Your development director wants to pause the programme due to rising costs, but you've already committed to the local authority. Your board chair is concerned about media coverage. Walk us through your first 48 hours."
This approach reveals far more than any competency framework. You observe their thought processes, priority-setting abilities, and understanding of the sector's complexities. Strong candidates immediately identify the need to separate urgent from important, demonstrate awareness of regulatory implications, and show genuine empathy for residents while maintaining commercial focus.
The Stakeholder Navigation Test
Social housing leaders must excel at managing competing interests from residents, regulators, local authorities, board members, and communities. We've developed a role-play exercise where the candidate must facilitate a heated discussion between fictional board members with opposing views on a contentious issue—perhaps selling properties to fund new development versus investing in existing stock.
The most effective candidates don't try to find compromise solutions that please everyone. Instead, they demonstrate skills in active listening, reframing discussions around shared values, and making tough decisions while maintaining relationships. They understand that in social housing, perfect solutions rarely exist, but principled leadership can navigate through complexity.
Assessing Cultural Fit and Values Alignment
Technical competence means nothing if a leader cannot connect with the organisation's mission. We've learned to probe deeply into candidates' motivations for working in social housing. The warning signs are clear: candidates who speak exclusively about career progression, those who cannot articulate why social housing matters, or executives who view the sector as a stepping stone to more prestigious roles.
Strong candidates often have personal connections to social housing—perhaps they grew up in council housing, witnessed housing insecurity in their communities, or chose to leave higher-paid private sector roles because they wanted meaningful work. They speak passionately about housing as a fundamental human right and understand the life-changing impact of their organisations.
The Regulatory Acumen Assessment
Social housing operates within an increasingly complex regulatory environment. Rather than asking candidates to recite knowledge of the Regulator of Social Housing's standards, we present them with real regulatory scenarios our clients have faced. We might describe a situation where tenant satisfaction scores are declining, complaints are rising, and the organisation needs to demonstrate improvement quickly.
Effective candidates understand that regulatory compliance isn't about box-ticking—it's about embedding good governance and tenant focus into organisational culture. They speak about proactive engagement with regulators, the importance of early intervention, and how regulatory requirements can drive positive change rather than being bureaucratic burdens.
Testing Financial Acumen in Context
Social housing finance differs significantly from commercial property or other sectors. We assess candidates' understanding through practical exercises: reviewing actual board papers, analyzing development appraisals with social housing grant complications, or working through rent setting decisions that balance affordability with investment needs.
The strongest candidates demonstrate numerical literacy while showing awareness of the social impact of financial decisions. They understand concepts like EBITDA-MRI and social housing grant accounting, but more importantly, they grasp how financial decisions affect an organisation's ability to serve its residents and communities.
Board Dynamics and Governance Understanding
Many talented executives struggle with social housing governance structures. Board members often have limited executive experience, strong personal views about housing, and may represent specific constituencies or interests. We simulate board scenarios where candidates must present controversial recommendations, handle challenging questions, or manage situations where board members overstep into operational matters.
Successful candidates show respect for governance processes while demonstrating ability to lead and influence. They understand that board management in social housing requires different skills than managing corporate boards—more educational, more collaborative, but equally strategic.
The Community Engagement Reality Check
Community engagement isn't optional in social housing—it's fundamental to success. We present candidates with community consultation scenarios, perhaps around estate regeneration or service changes. We look for evidence that they understand community engagement as genuine partnership rather than information-sharing exercises.
Strong candidates talk about co-design, building trust over time, and acknowledging that communities often have good reasons for skepticism about housing organisations. They demonstrate cultural sensitivity and understand that effective community engagement requires significant investment of time and resources.
Reference Checking That Reveals Truth
Our reference process goes far beyond confirming employment dates and responsibilities. We speak with former colleagues, board members, and crucially, people who worked for the candidate. In social housing, leadership style matters enormously—organisations with strong internal cultures consistently outperform those with talented but disconnected leadership teams.
We ask specific questions about how candidates handled difficult situations, their approach to staff development, and their ability to maintain team morale during challenging periods. We also explore how they balanced competing demands and whether they demonstrated genuine commitment to their organisation's mission.
Creating the Right Interview Environment
The physical and psychological environment for senior housing sector interviews should reflect the sector's values. We recommend conducting at least part of the process at the organisation's offices, ideally including a brief tour of housing stock. This serves two purposes: it demonstrates the organisation's pride in its work, and it allows assessment of how candidates interact with frontline staff and respond to the realities of social housing.
Some of our most successful placements have resulted from interviews where candidates met residents, visited recently completed developments, or spent time with housing officers. These interactions often reveal more about leadership potential than formal presentations.
Red Flags and Warning Signs
Experience has taught us to watch for specific warning signs during interviews. Candidates who cannot discuss failures or learning experiences often lack the resilience social housing demands. Those who speak dismissively about regulation, community engagement, or tenant feedback typically struggle with the sector's collaborative requirements.
We're particularly cautious about candidates who focus exclusively on financial metrics or who seem primarily motivated by the potential for property development profits. Social housing organisations need leaders who understand commercial realities but are fundamentally driven by social purpose.
The Follow-Up Assessment
For senior roles, we often recommend a follow-up session focusing on the candidate's first 100 days in post. This reveals their understanding of the organisation's specific challenges and their approach to building relationships and establishing credibility. Strong candidates have clearly researched the organisation thoroughly and can articulate specific actions they would take to understand the culture, meet key stakeholders, and identify priority areas for attention.
Making the Final Decision
The most effective housing organisation boards use a structured scoring system that weights different competencies appropriately. Technical skills might represent 30% of the assessment, with leadership capabilities, cultural fit, and sector understanding making up the remainder. This prevents boards from over-indexing on impressive CVs while missing candidates who would truly excel in the role.
Conclusion
Successful recruitment of senior housing sector leaders requires interview approaches that reflect the sector's unique demands and complexities. By moving beyond generic competency questions to scenario-based assessments that test real-world capabilities, organisations can identify leaders who will genuinely thrive in social housing's challenging but rewarding environment.
The investment in thorough, sector-specific interview processes pays dividends through reduced executive turnover, stronger organisational performance, and ultimately, better outcomes for the residents and communities that social housing organisations exist to serve.
Are you looking for a new leadership role, or keen to speak with talented professionals to fill your vacancy?To explore working with Rachel to connect with leaders with the expertise required to drive your organisation forward, or to future-proof your business, email rbirbeck@lincolncornhill.co.uk
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
